Get it while it lasts.
https://horseandplow.com/product/2024-rose-mendocino-county/
The Delicious Revolution Will Be Vinified: News and Views on Organically Grown Wine
Get it while it lasts.
https://horseandplow.com/product/2024-rose-mendocino-county/
Culver City, here they come. Last year's historic launch of S.O.R.B.E.T. at Fort Mason spawns a new southern California tasting this year. May 3 is the date.
See the post as intended - at Substack. https://organicwineuncorked.substack.com/p/la-save-the-date-sunday-may-3-sonoma
K&L Wines is bringing Sonoma Valley’s organic, regenerative and biodynamic winemakers (S.O.R.B.E.T.) and wines to Culver City for a grand tasting May 3. It’s the first time this group has poured at a K&L store or in SoCal.
Here all about it on The Wine Makers podcast.
The inspiration for the SoCal tasting came from K&L’s domestic wine buyer Ryan Woodhouse and Bedrock vintner Morgan Twain-Peterson who’ve connected. The Sonoma group had wanted to do a tasting in LA but the logistics were complicated. Thus, a great partnership was born.
K&L is also celebrating its 50th anniversary this year with a number of special tastings. And it is also opening a new store in New York City (announcement TBD).
California Wine Stars to Pour for SoCAL
This year is expected to bring together several dozen wineries, including some of the biggest stars–historic Hanzell, Bedrock, and Winery Sixteen 600, to name just a few.
Organizers pointed out, the S.O.R.B.E.T. tasting will feature a wide variety of wine styles and varietals.
The 2025 event featured 47 wineries pouring to a sold out crowd and also marked the debut of its signature, organic cotton teeshirt
“There’s already quite a few producers that are involved in S.O.R.B.E.T. that we work with and lots that I’m excited to start working with,” said Woodhouse. “I just thought it would great and mutually beneficial.”
S.O.R.B.E.T. started in 2025, after Sonoma Valley organic growers and vintners saw postings on Instagram of sheep grazing at vineyards they knew had just been sprayed with herbicide. (Not good.) They started trading snarky messages privately to their compadres (not the offending vineyard owners), outraged that herbicide loving vineyard owners would inflict this on rented flocks. And that the consumer might think the sheep were being responsibly treated.
As the organically farming community coalesced, they calculated that about at least 20 percent of the acreage in the Sonoma Valley appellation was either certified organic or farmed organically.
S.O.R.B.E.T. ’s Unique Requirement: Pesticide Use Report
To participate in S.O.R.B.E.T. tastings, producers must submit a pesticide use report (PUR) to the organizers showing they have not used any sprays prohibited under organic regulations. Required in California by state law, that standard report is submitted to state authorities annually and documents the sprays each grower uses. Organic farming does not allow synthetic herbicides, fungicides, insecticides or synthetic fertilizers.
Organic certification is not required, but using only materials permitted by organic regulations is a requirement.
The PUR for any property is publicly available from local county Ag Commissioners upon request. (I read them all the time).
Other specialized “eco” tastings have different standards.
• “Sustainable” wines do not require listing sprays used in order to pour at events.
• Raw Wine (a natural wine fair) does not require PURs, calls for organic farming (but does not require proof, partly because only California has PUR proof), does require native fermentation, and caps added sulfites and additives used in the winemaking process.
• Slow Wine does not require organic farming but does require producers to be transparent (in the winery entry in the book), describing materials used for plant protection, weed control and fertilizers on all vineyard sources (not just their own estates). Wines featured in the guide must be farmed without herbicide (though wineries can make other wines with herbicide). Many but not all of the wineries in the Slow Wine Guide farm organically and use only native fermentations.
(Speaking of which, the Slow Wine Guide for 2026 will be out shortly. Stay tuned. It is the last year Deborah Parker Wong and I will be the editors. It is a labor of love for us as well as for the 21 field contributors who work with us.)
Fine winemakers use limited amounts of sulfites, so pesticide use, not sulfites, is a good indicator of grape quality and often the resulting wine quality.
Are Consumers Looking for Organically Grown Wines? K&L Rep Says Yes
Speaking on the podcast, Woodhouse said, “We have a customer base that’s interested in it [organically grown wines], but I also see connection between wine quality and the ideology of folks…I think it makes better wine, growing it this way, making it this way. But I also think that’s not the only factor.”
“It is just better for our planet as well… if it tastes better, great, but we’re also doing a lot of positive beyond making great wine.”
Twain-Peterson said he was on a panel recently with Jason Haas, general manager of Tablas Creek, who he said told the group that among wines that carry the “made with organic grapes” designation, sales were up 15 percent year over year. “Which is in the current market a real thing,” Twain-Peterson added.
Grape sales are following a similar trend, he added, saying that Coastal Vineyard Care’s regenerative specialist Jordan Lonborg (formerly vineyard manager at Tablas Creek) said thousands of acres of grapes went unpicked on the Central Coast–which were not those being farmed regeneratively or organically. “Those were the first to go,” Twain-Peterson said. “It was the conventional stuff that usually is going into more production brand or whatever.”
“That’s the stuff that’s really in the crosshairs right now,” he said. “Here around the valley, we sold all our grapes last year,” before joking, “I have liked for them to be a little bit more expensive.”
MJ Towler (left), host of Black Wine Guy podcast speaks with Winery Sixteen 600’s Sam Coturri at the San Francisco debut S.O.R.B.E.T. event held at Fort Mason
Steeped in Organics | Sonoma Valley’s Unique Winegrowing Culture
Three of S.O.R.B.E.T.s’ founders all went to grade school together, providing some of the initial cohesion that got the group started. That group is Sam Coturri from Winery Sixteen 600, Morgan Twain-Peterson of Bedrock, and Katie Bundschu of Abbot's Passage Winery.
Their parents were all winegrowers and winemakers.
Said Morgan, collaboration is “something that I’ve always loved about Sonoma Valley in general…There is an element of community and an element of how can we collectively differentiate ourselves?”
Sonoma Valley does have the highest concentration of organically farmed vineyards in Sonoma County. Phil Coturri, the long time organic vineyard pioneer (and Sam’s father) has played a major role in evangelizing organic farming in Sonoma Valley (and on Moon Mountain) for close to 50 years.
“There is a very cool movement going on in Sonoma Valley,” Morgan continued, “that I think is very separate from what we’re seeing in other areas…And we want more people to be farming like that. Let’s continue the momentum.”
To that end, the group also offered its first Field Day in Feb. to share knowledge with their neighbors and friends.
Burgeoning Consumer Interest and Education
The biggest task ahead is helping consumers understand why better farming matters.
“I definitely think we see more and more interest in it all the time,” said Woodhouse. “I still think it’s something that needs defining in the eyes of the consumer. There’s a lot of confusion around it, which is another reason why I think doing an event like this is excellent.”
“You got a somewhat captive audience… and a bunch of producers that can speak to why they farm the way they do really well. We’re definitely seeing interest in that, especially with people that are in browsing the stores, like wanting that personal interaction–…it’s a little bit harder to know online and everything else, but we definitely mark wines as organic both online and in-store.”
“I think we’re going to see a huge interest in this event.”
See a list of producers at the S.O.R.B.E.T. 2025 tasting here and photos from the event here.
NOTE: I am mostly now publishing at my Substack, mainly because Google Blogspot changed their technical something or other and it will no longer let me post visuals!!! Please checkout the substack here if you're interested. I will sporadically post the headlines over here from time to time from the Substack but do not count on it.
Would you like to see for your self if the way a wine is farmed affects the taste or flavor? It’s difficult to have the opportunity, but in the last four years, Robert Hall Winery in Paso Robles conducted a ground breaking study designed to compare how conventional/sustainable farming versus regenerative-organic farming affects flavor, yield and costs.
We have move most our publishing over to Substack mainly because we can no longer publish photos here. (Google, what happened?)
Substack subscriptions are free. (Or paid if you would like to support us, which we need, due to the state of wine magazine ads and the loss of our freelance clients).
https://organicwineuncorked.substack.com/p/napas-organic-certification-achieved
Feb. 2, 2026
At a sold out screening, an enthusiastic Marin crowd filled the hall in Larkspur for a rare screening of the life of Fred Ross, Sr.
(Above: Fred Ross, Sr., with Delores Huerta)
He was tall and lanky and handsome-raised a Southern California surfer-and certainly not the likeliest candidate for a life organizing farmworkers to vote and unionize.
Organic Wines Uncorked is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber on substack.
But Fred Ross, Sr.’s life and significant achievements did not deserve to go undocumented, and the result, thanks to fine archival research and the filmmaking team headed by director Ray Telles (a Berkeley filmmaker whose earlier work has portrayed farmworkers’ fight for social and fair wages) is a compelling and magnificent–and very timely–reminder of how effective organizing and social movements can be…they can indeed move mountains, as Ross, Sr.’s life demonstrates.
To read the story go to the FREE substack newsletter here. (Having trouble posting visuals here, so I am migrating to substack.)
https://organicwineuncorked.substack.com/p/profiles-in-courage-american-agitators
Dai was a leading light for me (as he’s been to so many others) when I was trying to find my way into the organic circles of Oregon wine back in 2011. Being organic was still thought to be a bit dicey back then, and on my first professional visit to the Willamette Valley, organic growers were few and far between. Dai very graciously toured me through the amazing vineyard that is Temperance Hill, showing me its many microclimates and different exposures.
He’s been instrumental in sharing his knowledge and spreading the gospel about organic viticulture with many. The first Oregon Organic Winegrowing conference held in 2025 grew out of a conversation he had with Lemelson wine grower Rob Schultz. I was so fortunate to be invited to the conference and to cover it for WineBusiness.com. Here’s the article I wrote then, “Coffee, Collaboration and Community: Oregon Grower Group and Grand Cru Vintners Launch First Organically Grown Wine Conference,” which begins thusly…
A New “Grange Hall” Fueled by Coffee
It all started when Rob Schultz, who oversees Lemelson Vineyard’s seven, certified organic vineyards, and organic superstar grower Dai Crisp–he famously converted and certified the entire 100 acre Temperance Hill vineyard organic back in 2012-2014–were attending a viticulture event back in 2022.
“We were sitting together at the back, and they were talking about IPM–the basics, right? And here we were, two organic growers. I thought, ‘there should be an organic one of these.” Dai said, “There should be, and you should start it. I’ll call these people. You call those people. ‘Oh, cool.’”
GO TO the same story on substack to SEE THE PHOTOS https://organicwineuncorked.substack.com/p/organic-evangelist-and-luminary-dai. [Google has made it impossible for me to insert visuals here on blogger much to my chagrin.]
In the photo, Dai looks on at a session at the 2025 Oregon Organic Winegrowing conference held in McMinnville. The conference will be held again this year April 20-21 in McMinnville.
It’s no wonder that Dai is receiving the Founders Award from the Oregon Wine Board (press release below), after growing grapes for the greatest names in Oregon wine for 26 years at Temperance Hill. All organically. And at a time when that was even more uncommon.
Back in 2014, Wine & Spirits magazine called him “Grower of the Year” for his work at Temperance Hill. Today there are 29 wineries on the client roster. Today he’s handing on his knowledge of organic growing and building community.
• For those who want to continue the knowledge transfer and fun community, the 2026 Oregon Wine Growers Conference will be held April 20-21 in McMinnville.
• More info at https://www.organicwinegrowers.com.
Here’s a great interview with Dai from 2025 in which he describes how he transitioned from an interest in theater to his career in wine…and why Temperance Hill is called Temperance Hill. (You will never guess). He also recounts the story of the testing the spore trapping tech that saved a million vineyard sprays in Oregon alone and is now used globally.
CONTINUED ON FREE SUBSTACK POST...https://organicwineuncorked.substack.com/p/organic-evangelist-and-luminary-dai.
Reposting this article from The New Lede
Pam's note: The Global Glyphosate Study has been conducting the preeminent research on Roundup and glyphosate. Scientists from the USA, including some from U.C. Berkeley, have conducted research on the impacts of glyphosate.
See here:
And here:
Luoping Zhang has been a contributor to the Global Glyphosate Study.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31342895/
NOTE: Dr. Daniele Mandrioli did his postdoc work at U.C. Berkeley
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Carey Gillam
A leading European chemical safety institute has ousted the director of its cancer research center after the director led an extensive testing program into the safety of the pesticide glyphosate, sparking concerns about chemical industry influence into what has been an independent research institution.
Dr. Daniele Mandrioli joined the Ramazzini Institute in Bologna, Italy in 2012 and has directed the Institute’s Cesare Maltoni Cancer Research Center since 2020. The research facility conducts toxicology studies on a range of environmental substances to determine their carcinogenicity and other potential health implications.
Dr. Daniele Mandrioli served as director of the Ramazinni Institute’s Cesare Maltoni Cancer Research Center from 2020 until his recent termination.
The institute’s work has been used to inform regulatory decision-making and policy work on multiple chemicals, including vinyl chloride, benzene, and formaldehyde, and the group says it collaborates with the US National Toxicology Program as well as the US National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. It touts “50 YEARS OF INDEPENDENT RESEARCH” on its website and lists the World Health Organization as a partner.
But the dismissal of Mandrioli and the suspicion that it is tied to his work on glyphosate, has roiled scientific circles.
In a Jan. 21 letter to Ramazzini Institute President Loretta Masotti, Dr. Philip Landrigan, a US environmental epidemiologist and pediatrician who leads Boston College’s global public health program and who also is head of the International Scientific Advisory Committee of the Ramazzini Institute, described Mandrioli as a “superb scientist” and complained that the committee had not been consulted on the termination. The decision appeared to be due to industry pressure, the letter alleges.
“Dr. Mandrioli … has been subjected to vicious attacks by the chemical industry because the findings of the Institute’s independent research have cost these companies money and hurt their bottom line,” Landrigan wrote. “The attacks on Dr. Mandrioli have increased in intensity in recent months since publication of the results of the Global Glyphosate Study, which found that glyphosate causes dose-related increases in cancer at multiple anatomic sites in experimental animals, most notably increases in leukemia.”
“We are deeply concerned that your decision may signal an end to the independence of the Ramazzini Institute’s research,” the letter states.
When asked to comment about the concerns, Masotti said that the “relationship with Dr. Mandrioli was terminated by mutual agreement,” and was not due to pressure from the chemical industry. She said the glyphosate studies will continue.
“Our values of independent research have never been questioned. The Ramazzini Institute Cancer Research Center is an internationally recognized center of excellence, renowned for its numerous and exceptional contributions to environmental research, and recognized for its scientific integrity and independence,” Masotti said.
Under Mandrioli’s leadership, the research center has been focused recently on studying multiple potential health impacts from glyphosate, which is the world’s most widely used weed killing chemical. It is commonly known as the chief ingredient in Roundup brands made popular by Monsanto, a company now owned by the German conglomerate Bayer.
Many scientific studies over the years have linked glyphosate and Roundup to cancer, and the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer in 2015 classified the pesticide as probably carcinogenic to humans.
Close to 200,000 people sued Monsanto and Bayer in the US alleging their cancers are due to exposure to the glyphosate-based herbicides.
But Monsanto and subsequently Bayer maintain there is no valid science linking glyphosate to cancer and have furiously fought back against scientists and others who dispute that position, including those with the World Health Organization.
Last summer, Mandrioli and the research center published the results of a two-year study Mandrioli said showed “solid and independent scientific evidence of the carcinogenicity of glyphosate and glyphosate-based herbicides.” The study found, among other things, that co-formulants in glyphosate herbicide products may enhance the carcinogenicity of glyphosate, particularly in the case of leukemia.
The research was part of a “Global Glyphosate Study” involving scientists from Boston College, George Mason University, King’s College London, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Scientific Centre of Monaco, University of Bologna, the Institute of Agricultural Biology and Biotechnology of the Italian National Research Council the Italian National Institute of Health, and the National Food Safety Committee of the Italian Ministry of Health.
In 2022, the group published prior findings showing adverse effects of glyphosate at doses that are currently considered safe.
Bayer responded by accusing the Ramazzini Institute of having “a long history of making misleading claims about the safety of various products.” The company did not respond to a request for comment about Mandrioli’s dismissal.
Mandrioli said in an interview that he has been subject to “an incredible amount of attacks” because of the glyphosate study.
“Unfortunately, my experience is similar to what too many independent scientists are increasingly going through,” he said.
The research center is currently completing four new manuscripts on pesticide testing. It is not clear when those might be published.
Members of Collegium Ramazzini, a scientific academy of physicians and scientists from 45 countries, said in a statement that the process of terminating Mandrioli was “non-transparent” and “secretive”, and offered no rational explanation other than to say it was part of a “reorganization.”
The group said that the 2025 glyphosate study was “the largest international toxicological study ever performed on glyphosate and glyphosate-based herbicides” and that “attacks and defamatory campaigns” against Mandrioli “dramatically escalated” after the 2025 study was released.
The attacks sought to “undermine his credibility and the credibility of his team’s independent research findings on the toxicity of hazardous chemicals,” the group wrote.
Francesco Forastiere, a scientist with the National Research Council in Palermo, Italy and a visiting professor at Imperial College, London, said the dismissal “lacked justification and was abrupt.”
“There was no transparency in the operation,” said Forastiere, who sits on an advisory panel to the Institute. “I am astonished.”
Carey Gillam
Carey Gillam is the editor-in-chief of The New Lede and a veteran investigative journalist with more than 30 years of experience covering US news, including 17 years as a senior correspondent with Reuters international news service (1998-2015). She is the author of “Whitewash - The Story of a Weed Killer, Cancer and the Corruption of Science,” an expose of Monsanto’s corporate corruption of agriculture. The book won the coveted Rachel Carson Book Award from the Society of Environmental Journalists in 2018. Her second book, a narrative legal thriller titled The Monsanto Papers, was released March 2, 2021.
She also has contributed chapters for a text book about environmental journalism and a book about pesticide use in Africa.
Gillam testified as an invited expert before the European Parliament in 2017 about her research, and was a featured speaker at the World Forum for Democracy in Strasbourg, France in 2019. She also has been a keynote and/or panel speaker at events and universities throughout North America, Australia, The Netherlands, Brussels, and France.
Gillam writes regularly for The Guardian. Her work has additionally been published in The New York Times, Huffington Post, Time, and other outlets.
In 2022, Gillam helped launch The New Lede as a journalism initiative of the Environmental Working Group.
Gillam is a member of the Society of Environmental Journalists.
With his colleague from the University of Caen, Seralini and 40+ scientists from 5 countries call for new guidelines to test petro residues and formulations, not just isolated, individual chemicals.
Editor’s Note: There’s something we need to talk about…and, according to Seralini, it’s at the heart of our multiple health crises. Transparency would be a first step on the path to better understanding and scientific knowledge, he and colleagues say.
Until now, regulators have not taken the most sophisticated approach on how to test new and existing products, leading to a minefield of misinformation, Seralini and others say.
[Boldings below are mine]
From Seralini’s video released this week on YouTube illustrating his previous work on understanding pesticide toxicity stemming from using petroleum byproducts, a common method and one that is used to make Roundup, for instance.
SEE THIS WITH GRAPHICS AT MY SUBSTACK...
A Revolution is Vital for Planetary Health and Food Systems
By Gilles-Eric Séralini and Gérald Jungers
PARIS | 26 November 2025 (IDN) — Since the Second World War, we have been increasingly contaminated by chemicals that enter our bodies through dust, which is stable down to the infinitesimally small. Acting like long-term spam, these substances generate chronic diseases, cancers, and nervous system degeneration, among other ailments, from which virtually every family now suffers.
The same is true for biodiversity, burdened with petroleum-derived residues, the source of pesticides and plasticisers. Nanoplastics are currently authorised in pesticides.
In a paper published in 2022, Seralini and colleagues studied pesticide residues found in pesticide formulations, finding them abundant and harmful. The problem is profound, he says, leading to widespread of cases of autism, among other conditions.
Spraying pesticides also disrupts the climate, as the IPCC has highlighted. Plastic derivatives can be found on beaches worldwide, in the oceans, and throughout the biosphere. “We are the children of oil,” anthropologists of tomorrow will say, if they manage to exist.
Scientists warn
We raised the alarm about this in November 2025, with 43 scientists from 5 continents, leading international experts in pesticide and pollutant toxicology, as well as environmental and health sciences. And we propose solutions. Our work has just been published in a high-impact scientific journal, Environmental Sciences Europe: https://rdcu.be/eOj3c.
The article exposes the fraud and misconduct inherent in current regulatory assessments of toxic substances, including pesticides. For example, we discovered that pesticides are never tested in their commercial form, but only according to a few components declared by industry, an approach endorsed by health agencies. The declared ingredients are not always the most active in the marketed mixtures.
This is the case for the substance known as “glyphosate,” one of the components of the world’s leading pesticide, belonging to the Roundup family. For several years, we have published that glyphosate never exists alone: it is always mixed with toxic substances such as arsenic and other heavy metals, as well as undeclared carcinogenic petroleum residues that also have pesticidal properties.
The same is true for other pesticides. This fraudulently multiplies the toxicity of industry-declared substances several thousand-fold. We have denounced this for years before national and international health agencies, and legal proceedings are ongoing. Several associations and a coalition of European NGOs (PAN Europe and Secrets Toxiques) have drawn on our work to win a case before the Court of Justice of the European Union, which ruled that pesticides must be assessed in their entirety, not only on a few declared components, as regulatory agencies have done since their creation. A revolution in toxicological assessment is therefore imperative.
We must break decisively with this system of compromises. Similar misconduct already sent responsible parties to prison in the United States in the 1980s. Yet, the products at the centre of these scandals remain in the environment and on the market: PFAS, bisphenols, and PCBs developed by Monsanto, now Bayer.
Failures of the economic system
Unfortunately, international trade agreements are not affected by court rulings, including those against Monsanto-Bayer (formerly Mobay during the Second World War). This is illustrated by recent settlements exceeding $ 10 billion for false declarations in cases brought by cancer patients harmed by Roundup.
Even so, these legal outcomes still do not trigger the regulatory reforms that would have prevented the worldwide spread of pollutants primarily responsible for the harms we highlight.
The well-known failures of the economic system generate poor plant, animal, and human health by promoting an intensive agricultural model that deliberately underestimates the toxicity of pesticides and plasticisers, producing harmful food on a global scale. All of this is effectively subsidised through the privatisation of public money: the largest budgets are channelled into intensive agriculture under a growth-driven model that, while claiming to support farmers, in reality fuels massive pesticide use and ultimately enriches the major chemical companies.
We propose straightforward solutions: reducing regulatory toxicity thresholds for existing pollutants by at least a factor of one hundred and requiring complete long-term assessments of any new product before it reaches the market, rather than testing only a handful of selected components, as industry and agencies currently do.
Equally essential is complete transparency of agency and industry data; the confidentiality that now surrounds these practices only enables misconduct.
Furthermore, the development of agroecological practices is more than indispensable for the biosphere, our food systems, and our future. It has been shown that the world can be fed with a diet less reliant on meat, avoiding the model of animal concentration camps.
Today, global agriculture serves more to feed pigs, chickens, and cows in wealthy countries than to nourish hungry children, unlike what some champions of the Green Revolution claimed. Sadly, this has come at the expense of forests and through the overexploitation of arable land. It also contributes to the accelerated degradation of the ocean through overfishing.
We have the means to save the world, but far too many political weaknesses prevent the necessary decisions from being taken today.
*Gilles-Eric Séralini is a professor of toxicology and molecular biology at the University of Caen Normandy. Together with Gérald Jungers, an affiliated researcher, they are members of the Risks, Quality and Sustainable Environment Cluster at the MRSH. (IDN-InDepthNews)
Video
A video appeared today on YouTube with Seralini detailing his findings. So far it is only available in French but I am working on getting an English transcript.
(Seralini’s remarks begin at 17 minutes into the video.)
/

Saga Robotics' trialed the UV robots at Bien Nacido in the Central Coast
According to Google Search AI: "California wine grape growers heavily utilize fungicides, with approximately 90% of acreage treated annually, primarily for powdery mildew, which accounts for 74% of all pesticide applications. Programs typically involve 5.6 to 8+ in-season applications. Sulfur is the most used material, though synthetic fungicides like myclobutanil and quinoxyfen are also common."
[Saga Robotics press release announcing the management change.]
22nd Jan 2026 - Saga Robotics today announced the appointment of Caine Thompson as General Manager, U.S., effective January 26, 2026, as the company accelerates its commercial expansion in the U.S.
During the 2025 California wine grape season, Saga Robotics successfully achieved a 10x increase in acres under treatment, marking a significant milestone in the adoption of its autonomous Thorvald UV-C robot. Building on this momentum, the company expects to almost triple treated acreage again in 2026.
Caine brings more than 20 years of leadership experience across agriculture, sustainability, and commercial operations in the United States and New Zealand.
Most recently, Caine Thompson served as General Manager & Head of Sustainability at O’Neill Vintners & Distillers, where he led large-scale operational growth while advancing sustainability and regenerative farming initiatives across complex agricultural value chains.
Caine has been widely recognized in the wine industry as one of Wine Enthusiasts Future 40, one of Wine Business Monthly's Sustainability Stewards and the only US board member of the Regenerative Viticulture Foundation, where he is leading regenerative viticulture around the globe.
“To accelerate sustainable and regenerative viticulture further, chemical free winegrowing is the holy grail. The Thorvald UV-C robot is a rare technological breakthrough that is a solution to this problem. This is lowering the barrier to entry into sustainable, organic and regenerative winegrowing by eliminating the need for synthetic chemicals, which is transforming winegrowing” said Caine Thompson.
“As Saga Robotics enters its next phase of scale in the U.S., Caine Thompson brings exactly the operational discipline and commercial experience we need,” said Sacha de La Noë, CEO of Saga Robotics. “His track record in building teams, executing growth strategies, and working closely with growers makes him exceptionally well suited to lead our U.S. business as demand for sustainable disease control continues to accelerate.”
Founder PÃ¥l Johan From will transition from his role as General Manager, U.S., and return to Norway to assume the newly created position of Chief Growth Officer. In this role, PÃ¥l will lead strategic partnerships, UV-C technology development, expansion into new crops and markets, and support future fundraising activities. To ensure continuity through the critical 2026 season, PÃ¥l will remain actively involved in U.S. operations through June 2026.
As a supplementary close to its 2025 funding round, Saga Robotics also announced Xinomavro as a new investor. Xinomavro is an AgTech investment fund dedicated exclusively to technologies supporting the wine industry, led by wine industry insiders Guillaume De Pracomtal and Gregoire Letort. The investment strengthens Saga Robotics’ capital base while adding deep sector expertise to its investor group.
“Saga Robotics is addressing one of the wine industry’s most pressing challenges with a solution that is both practical and transformative,” said Guillaume De Pracomtal of Xinomavro. “Their ability to scale autonomous UV-C treatment in commercial vineyards positions them as a category leader, and we’re excited to support the team as adoption and additional services continue to grow.”
Saga Robotics looks forward to welcoming Caine Thompson and thanks PÃ¥l Johan From for his continued leadership and lasting contributions to the company’s growth and success.
For more on this story, see https://agfundernews.com/saga-robotics-bets-big-on-us-vineyards-with-new-gm-fresh-capital-for-uv-c-bots-chemical-free-winegrowing-is-the-holy-grail
From Jan. 29 to 31, the Zinfandel Associates and Producers celebrates its 35th anniversary in style–way uptown–in Napa with a weekend of festivities accompanied by gourmet food.
Starting Thursday night with two intimate, winery hosted dinners, the multiday event is offering special weekend packages that include two nights of lodging at the Archer Hotel, a Saturday morning master class with vintners (including ZAP O.G. Joel Peterson) and a grand tasting Saturday afternoon at CIA's Copia center in Napa with chef prepared bites.
A Different Kind of Grand Tasting
ZAP is taking a unique approach to this tasting, writing on its website,
"This is an intimate gathering of only 200, featuring a carefully curated selection of winemakers and principals from 40 wineries, ready to pop the corks on their special offerings, including big bottles and rare wines. Set up as one expansive “lounge,” guests are encouraged to relax and savor acclaimed Zinfandels at the winery tables, as well as the ZAP-hosted bar.
Winemakers are also set loose to roam. It’s like an enhanced Heritage Lounge! Treat yourself to delightful bites crafted by Copia chefs and food artisans, ensuring a memorable afternoon in this charming setting."
Who'e Organic at the Zinex Grand Tasting?
Eight producers who make Zinfandel from organic vines will be pouring.
Enjoy finding your favorite from these top tier producers:
With more than 20 wineries now certified regenerative organic and a few more using other regenerative certifications (that do not require organic farming or certification), regenerative viticulture is beginning to entice more and more younger consumers. Its presence in the wine world trails that of its growing popularity in the food world, but is gaining momentum.
The Sustainable Foods Summit in North America will feature a talk on this topic Jan 28 at the City Club of San Francisco at an industry gathering that is expected to attract leaders in transitioning to more biocircular and nature based approaches to food products.
Central Coast farmer Dr. Timothy LaSalle, co-founder, Center for Regenerative Agriculture and Resilient Systems at Cal State Chico, will speak on Measuring Impacts of Regenerative Agriculture.
The conference brochure description says, "Although the positive impacts of regenerative agriculture are increasingly recognized, measurement remains a challenge. Learn about approaches to measure the impact on soil, farms, supply chains, and ecosystems."
More information is available here.
Beautiful 445 Acre Farm with 149 Acres of CCOF Vineyards at the Headwaters of the Russian River
It breaks my heart to see the video online about the sale of McFadden Farm and Vineyard because McFadden has been one of my shining stars for 15 years. It was part of my introduction to organic viticulture.
Nestled in bucolic Potter Valley, Guinness McFadden and his family made this into one of California’s most incredible wine grape sites, selling Riesling to Chateau Montelena and making some of the best, affordable sparkling wines around. (I used to buy about 7 cases a year when I was in the money). He started as a grower and then became a vintner later on (see Blue Quail), like many former Bonterra growers up there in inland Mendocino, where there is lower disease pressure.
I recently upgraded to the current OS on Mac...Despite numerous calls to Apple tech support and Google Help searches, Google's blogspot platform is apparently no longer able to post photos in my stories. I do not see why not - it all seems kind of senseless and a huge drawback to using Goggle's popular blog software. Therefore like many wine journalists and writers, I am publishing more easily on Substack where I also have a way of categorizing regions. Check it out here.
To see this story (accompanied by the intended photos head) on over to...
https://organicwineuncorked.substack.com/p/bucolic-mendocino-vineyard-and-farm
After a name change from the Festival of Forgotten Grapes and launching last year in LA, this new wine festival is growing and adding an additional, new venue in San Jose. It's also been renamed Festival of Undiscovered Grapes.
The goal? To make Californians drink more adventurously. That should be fun!
Here are the wineries with organically grown grapes (certified estate or purchased grapes) you can taste from at the Jan. 31 San Jose event. (An asterisk indicates an estate winery where all the wines are from certified grapes).
This is a great opportunity to explore some of California's most interesting vintners and learn why you ought to be drinking Albarino, Grenache Blanc, Mourvedre, Vermentino and more–wines the rest of the world loves, too.
Alta Colina Vineyard & Winery*
AmByth Estate
Bokisch Vineyards
Brosseau Wines*
Camins 2 Dreams
Cary Q Wines
Clif Family Winery & Farm*
Martha Stoumen
Ridge Vineyards
Robert Hall
Stolpman Vineyards
Tablas Creek Vineyard
Terah Wine Co.
Tres Sabores Winery
Vino Tahoe*
I've recently tested a few wine related searches on Google search and come up short–WAY SHORT. I went to an event recently where the speaker referred to AI as "his drunken assistant," which I am beginning to parrot.
For instance, here's an example. I searched for the date when Cambie and Coturri met for the first time at a conference in the Rhone. They started a wonderful collaboration after that–A Deux Tetes–under the Coturri family's Winery Sixteen 600 brand in Sonoma.
If AI was actually smart it would have found the actual photo of Cambie and Coturri in Sonoma. or they might have found my other blog post about the two of them, showing a photo of them both pal-ing around together and another enjoying a meal.
How could they not index the latter in their search?
Just a question.
Other Champagne producers are organic–in fact there's a whole association of them (see it here)–and many are also biodynamic certified. They are all grower champagnes.
But Telmont marks the first regenerative organic brand.
It also provides full transparency on sourcing and organic certification on its website.
Rémy Cointreau became majority shareholder of Telmont in 2020.
Leonardo DiCaprio became a minority owner of the fourth generation winery in 2022. While current vintages come from organic grapes (starting in 2017), it will be several years before the ROC grapes are vinified and bottled. More info here.
![]() |
| DiCaprio with Ludovic du Plessis, President of Maison Telmont |
In a statement on the brand's website, DiCaprio says:
"Champagne Telmont, together with its partner wine-growers, has set its sights on producing 100% organic champagne, ensuring a completely sustainable production lifecycle in the coming years. From protecting biodiversity on its land, to using 100% renewable electricity, Champagne Telmont is determined to radically lower its environmental footprint, making me proud to join as an investor."
Star of the hit (and very prescient) movie One Battle After Another, which just won best picture (and won best director for Paul Thomas Anderson as well) at the Golden Globes this week, people have joking that Telmont is "one bottle after another."
Press Release
A major new study (full report here) released by Sud Vin Bio shows that organically grown wine continues to grow sales in France, increasing 7 percent in 2024 (when overall wine sales declined).
Growth was powered mainly by younger buyers–the under 35 set represents 31% of organic wine consumers. And 35% drink organic wine on a regular basis.
Growers and producers also continue to rise in numbers – 53 new producers were added in the past year in France, after growing nearly 400 percent from 3,729 producers in 2010 to 12,075 in 2024.
Who is buying organic wine? In this survey it shows growth tilted in favor of younger drinkers.
There is a wealth of great content and data in the full report.
The Millesieme Bio Organic Wine Conference takes place Jan. 26-28 in Montpelier.
![]() |
Consider making yours the greener ones...
Your choices could easily include organically grown bubbly! All below are traditional method (i.e. fermented on yeast, lees).
Traditional Grapes (Pinot Noir, Chardonnay)
--Organic
Chalone / Monterey County
• Under the Wire Brosseau Vineyard (and Flatiron SF) ($54)
Mendocino | Anderson Valley
• Handley Cellars 2019 Blanc de Blanc ($60)
• Long Meadow Ranch 2019 Blanc de Noirs ($85) and 2020 Brut Rosé ($125)
• Neal Family Vineyards sparkling wine 2021 One & Only Blanc de Blanc ($50)
Mendocino / Potter Valley
A TOP PICK • McFadden Vineyards Brut Rosé ($35) and Brut ($35) ***** My personal fave for price and quality
Napa
• Matthiasson's first Sparkling Wine (Linda Vista Chardonnay) ($85)
• Burgess Cellars offers a 2020 Blanc de Blanc from its Napa vines ($125)
Sonoma
• Canihan Wines Brut Nature 2019 ($48)
• Gloria Ferrer Sencilla 2021 (100 cases; $85) In Spanish, Sencilla means “simple." As a zero dosage 100 percent Chardonnay sparkling wine, it showcases the power and finesse of organically farmed Chardonnay without any added sugar. (Ferrer has now converted 338 acres of their vineyards to organics! But it will be a few years before those wines become available.)
--Biodynamic
Oregon | Willamette Valley
• King Estate's 2019 Brut Cuvee ($40)
• Soter Vineyards 2021 Mineral Springs Brut Rosé ($80) and a full spectrum of sparkling wines
Oregon / Gorge
• Analemma 2018 Atavus Blanc de Noirs Sparkling ($76)
Other Sparkling Wines (Non Traditional Grapes)
California
• Amista Vineyards (Dry Creek Valley, Sonoma County) 4+ wines: Chardonnay, Grenache, Mourvedre and Syrah ($50+)
• Bokisch Vineyards (Lodi) Cava Inspired 2023 Lo Xalet Sparkling Wine ($60) (Spanish Indigenous Variety Grapes) and a 2024 Sparkling Albarino and a 2023 Sparkling Rosé
• Neal Family Vineyards (Napa) Spokes Sparkling Wine ($40) (Vermentino)
----
BONUS SECTION | Charmat Method Wines
• Cricket Farms Brut Sparkling Wine (Lake County) 3 wine: Chardonnay, Chenin Blanc and Viognier
• Robert Hall (Paso Robles) Cavern Select 2022 Grenache Blanc ($45)
----
ANOTHER BONUS SECTION | Imported Organic Sparklings
• Avaline Sparkling (Raventos) $35 (not available at Target; only the Prosecco is at Target which is not traditional method) Order Online
Argentina
• Domaine Bousquet
Spain
• Any Cava Guarda Superior from 2025 onward
• Raventos Blanc
• Vins el Cep (via Wine.com)
TOP PICK • Vilarnau Brut Reserva Rose $18 at Total Wine
----
ACTUAL CHAMPAGNE PRODUCERS
I love the grower champagnes who are organic or biodynamic.
There is an association of all the organic and biodynamic grower champagne producers – find a list of them here. Or check out their instagram https://www.instagram.com/champagnesbiologiques/?hl=en
I am currently partial to Champagne de Sousa (biodynamic) which is available in the USA - $46-67 (3 wines) at Bottle Barn and at other retailers, and of course Champagne Fleury (also biodynamic). It is not easy to be organic in wet, damp Champagne but there are skilled producers who accomplish this task. Some say it's easier when you are biodynamic. Fleury also has a cool wine bar in Paris.
To keep up with organic and biodynamic developments in Champagne, have a look at Caroline Henry's awesome substack newsletter (and book).
----
LAST YEAR'S SPARKLING ROUNDUP Blog Post
Is it the original sin? Our early evaluations of the herbicide Roundup (a formulation) and glyphosate simply did not "see" the bacteria in our gut as part of our anatomy, and that is why scientists hypothesized (wrongly and bigly) that Roundup was safe for humans, because we did not have that the shikimate pathway, which, AI tells us,
"is a vital seven-enzyme metabolic route in plants, fungi, and bacteria, responsible for producing essential aromatic amino acids (phenylalanine, tyrosine, tryptophan) and many other crucial aromatic compounds like folates, ubiquinone, and lignins, starting from erythrose-4-phosphate and phosphoenolpyruvate. Animals lack this pathway, making it a target for herbicides like glyphosate (which inhibits an enzyme in the pathway) and potential broad-spectrum antibiotics."
While we had discovered that our innate biological physical material does not have the pathway, our gut bacteria does...hence...cancers develop, etc. (We are not so cleverly partitioned in our beings as in our minds.)
So here we are, and building on this knowledge an A List gang of scientists at Cambridge have allied with the latest AI tool (LLM) to discover, lo and behold, that nature does not compartmentalize things are we have previously thought.
• Press release about their research (easy to read)
• Journal article of the research (well written, scientific research article)
"A large-scale laboratory screening of human-made chemicals has identified 168 chemicals that are toxic to bacteria found in the healthy human gut. These chemicals stifle the growth of gut bacteria thought to be vital for health.
Most of these chemicals, likely to enter our bodies through food, water, and environmental exposure, were not previously thought to have any effect on bacteria.
Lead scientist Roux said, "We’ve found that many chemicals designed to act only on one type of target, say insects or fungi, also affect gut bacteria."
The new research tested the effect of 1,076 chemical contaminants on 22 species of gut bacteria in the lab.
Chemicals that have a toxic effect on gut bacteria include pesticides like herbicides and insecticides that are sprayed onto food crops, and industrial chemicals used in flame retardants and plastics.
The human gut microbiome is composed of around 4,500 different types of bacteria, all working to keep our body running smoothly. When the microbiome is knocked out of balance there can be wide-ranging effects on our health including digestive problems, obesity, and effects on our immune system and mental health."
The study found that "out of 1,076 compounds in total, 829 were pesticides, 119 were pesticide metabolites, 48 were industrial chemicals, 5 were mycotoxins and 76 were other, pesticide-related compounds."
Another convincing reason to eat (and drink) only organically farmed food and drink.

A message and an invite from Cooper Garrod. Christmas crafting comes to a winery we love.
"We have been saving up our corks all year for this!
Saturday and Sunday, we will be hosting a CORK ORNAMENT MAKING TABLE here at Cooper-Garrod. For $5, you can step up and try your hand at making a cork reindeer, or whatever other holiday design you might like to try! We will provide all of the supplies. What a FUN WAY to enjoy a glass of wine around the holidays!
No advance reservation needed for making a cork ornament - but we DO recommend making a reservation for your wine tasting."
The winery also offers horseback riding and is a great historical attraction as well. The family has preserved its heritage as an apricot facility and a symbol of the South Bay's aviation history.
I'm happy to share this news with you, honoring both King Estate and Ed King and Organic and Biodynamic Farming and Certification
PRESS RELEASE
Ed King is Oregon’s first American Wine Legend winner
Wine Enthusiast Magazine has named Ed King the 2025 American Wine Legend. King, co-founder and co-CEO of King Estate Winery in Eugene, Ore., will receive the award in New York City on Jan. 26, 2026, at the 26th annual Wine Star Awards gala.
“I’m honored to be recognized as an American Wine Legend by Wine Enthusiast Magazine,” King said. “When we bottled our first vintage in 1992, Oregon wine was still finding its place on the world stage. But we believed in its potential. It took vision, hard work and a shared commitment from the many hands who helped build King Estate. More than 30 years later, seeing how far Oregon wine has come and knowing we played a part is deeply rewarding.”
Oregon is the fourth largest wine producing state in the country, comprising about 2% of the national wine market. Ed King is the first Oregon winemaker to win the American Wine Legend award.
About Ed King: With a work ethic honed in his native Kansas, Ed King came west and found his future in a 600-acre plot of land used to grow hay for cattle. In 1991, the nascent Oregon wine industry was still emerging as an economic and cultural force. King Estate planted its flag in Eugene, expanded to 1,033 acres, and made a name for itself as an early champion of Pinot Gris in a Pinot Noir state, opening up national markets to the varietal and to Oregon wine more broadly. In another ahead-of-its-time achievement, King Estate was certified as organic in 2002 and Biodynamic® in 2016, living out its commitment to stewardship, one of its core founding principles.
Thanks to The New Lede for this story and to the hundreds of others who ran it. The story is even in Le Monde in Paris.
Citing “serious ethical concerns,” journal retracts key Monsanto Roundup safety study
The journal Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology has formally retracted a sweeping scientific paper published in the year 2000 that became a key defense for Monsanto’s claim that Roundup herbicide and its active ingredient glyphosate don’t cause cancer.
Journal Editor-in-Chief Prof. Martin van den Berg, Ph.D., said in a note accompanying the retraction that he had taken the step because of “serious ethical concerns regarding the independence and accountability of the authors of this article and the academic integrity of the carcinogenicity studies presented.”
The paper, titled “Safety Evaluation and Risk Assessment of the Herbicide Roundup and Its Active Ingredient, Glyphosate, for Humans,” concluded that Monsanto’s glyphosate-based weed killers posed no health risks to humans – no cancer risks, no reproductive risks, no adverse effects on development of endocrine systems in people or animals. Regulators around the world have cited the paper as evidence of the safety of glyphosate herbicides, including the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in this assessment.
The listed authors of the paper were three scientists who did not work for Monsanto – Gary Williams, Robert Kroes and Ian Munro – and the paper was touted by the company as a defense against conflicting scientific evidence linking Roundup to cancer. The fact that it was authored by scientists from outside the company, from seemingly independent researchers, gave it added validity.
But over the last decade, internal company documents that came to light in litigation brought by cancer victims have revealed that the paper actually was a product of three years of what one company official referred to as “hard work” by several Monsanto scientists who helped craft the paper as part of a strategy Monsanto called “Freedom to Operate” (FTO).
The corporate files show that company officials celebrated their work when the paper was published. In one such email following the April 2000 publication of the Williams paper, Monsanto government affairs official Lisa Drake described the toll the work developing “independent” research papers took on multiple Monsanto’s scientists.
“The publication by independent experts of the most exhaustive and detailed scientific assessment ever written on glyphosate … was due to the perseverance, hard work and dedication of the following group of folks,” Drake wrote. She then listed seven Monsanto employees. The group was applauded for “their hard work over three years of data collection, writing, review and relationship building with the papers’ authors.”
Drake further emphasized why the Williams paper was so significant for Monsanto’s business plans: “This human health publication on Roundup herbicide and its companion publication on ecotox and environmental fate will be undoubtedly be regarded as “the” reference on Roundup and glyphosate safety,” she wrote in the email dated May 25, 2000. “Our plan is now to utilize it both in the defense of Roundup and Roundup Ready crops worldwide and in our ability to competitively differentiate ourselves from generics.”
In a separate email, a company executive asked if Roundup logo polo shirts could be given to eight people who worked on the research papers as a “token of appreciation for a job well done.”
Monsanto’s Hugh Grant, who at that time was a senior executive on his way toward being named CEO and chairman, added his own praise, writing in an email “This is very good work, well done to the team, please keep me in the loop as you build the PR info to go with it.”
In 2015, Monsanto scientist William Heydens suggested that he and colleagues “ghost-write” another scientific paper. Monsanto could pay outside scientists to “edit & sign their names” to the work that he and others would do, Heydens wrote in an email. “Recall that is how we handled Williams Kroes and Munro 2000.”
The emails were spotlighted in jury trials in which cancer victims won billions of dollars in damages from Monsanto, which was bought by Bayer AG in 2018.
In explaining the decision to retract, van den Berg wrote:
“Concerns were raised regarding the authorship of this paper, validity of the research findings in the context of misrepresentation of the contributions by the authors and the study sponsor and potential conflicts of interest of the authors.” He noted that the paper’s conclusions regarding the carcinogenicity of glyphosate were solely based on unpublished studies from Monsanto, ignoring other outside, published research.
Van den Berg did not respond to a request for comment.
When asked about the retraction, Bayer said in a statement that Monsanto’s involvement was adequately noted in the acknowledgements section of the paper in question, including a statement that referred to “key personnel at Monsanto who provided scientific support.” The company said the vast majority of thousands of published studies on glyphosate had no Monsanto involvement.
“The consensus among regulatory bodies worldwide that have conducted their own independent assessments based on the weight of evidence is that glyphosate can be used safely as directed and is not carcinogenic,” the company said.
An EPA spokesman said that the agency is aware of the retraction but “has never relied on this specific article in developing any of its regulatory conclusions on glyphosate.” The spokesman said the EPA has “extensively studied glyphosate, reviewing more than 6,000 studies across all disciplines, including human and environmental health, in developing its regulatory conclusions.” The updated human health risk assessment the agency is currently conducting for glyphosate is “using gold standard science,” the spokesman said. That assessment should be released for public comment in 2026 and will not be relying on the retracted article.
Brent Wisner, one of the lead lawyers in the Roundup litigation and a key player in getting the internal documents revealed to the public, said the retraction was “a long time coming.”
Wisner said the Williams, Kroes and Munro study was the “quintessential example of how companies like Monsanto could fundamentally undermine the peer-review process through ghostwriting, cherry-picking unpublished studies, and biased interpretations.”
“Faced with undisputed evidence concerning how this study was manufactured and then used, for over two decades, to protect glyphosate sales, the Editor-in-Chief … did the right thing,” Wisner said. “While the damage done to the scientific discourse—and the people who were harmed by glyphosate—cannot be undone, it helps rejuvenate some confidence in the otherwise broken peer-review process that corporations have taken advantage of for decades. This garbage ghostwritten study finally got the fate it deserved. Hopefully, journals will now be more vigilant in protecting the impartiality of science on which so many people depend.”
----
MY NOTE: 2017 coverage of the New York Medical College defending Gary Williams (the only one of the three scientists who signed the paper) is unsettling and deserves a followup.